nataraj

> Körperlichkeit & indische Philosophie in (laya) Yoga &  Bharatanatyam <

by Angela-Petra Saber-Zaimian

„yato hastas tato drstir, yato drstis tato manah, yato manas tato bhavo,yato bhavas tato rasah“ – Abhinayadarpana, Vers 37,  Nandikesvara . Wo die Hände sind/sich hinbewegen dort ist der Blick, wo der Blick ist, ist der Geist,wo der Geist ist, ist das Gefühl, wo das Gefühl ist, ist (entsteht) Rasa.

> Abhinavabharati < an interpretation of Bharata’s Natyasastra

> Abhinavabharati < Pearls from  4th Chapt. AbhinavabhÄratÄ

Abhinavabharati is a commentary on ancient Indian author Bharata Muni’s work of dramatic theory, the Natyasastra. It is the only old commentary available on this work.

The Abhinavabharati was written by Abhinavagupta (ca.950-1020), the great > Kashmiri Saivite < spiritual leader and a yogi.

In this monumental work, Abhinavagupta explains the rasasutra of Bharata in consonance with the theory of abhivyakti (expression) propounded in Anandavardhana’s (820-890) work Dhvanyaloka („aesthetic suggestion“), as well as the tenets of the Pratyabhijna philosophy of Kashmir.

According to Abhinavagupta, the aesthetic experience is the manifestation of the innate dispositions of the self, such as love and sorrow, by the self. It is characterised by the contemplation of the bliss of the self by the connoisseur. It is akin to the spiritual experience as one transcends the limitations of one’s limited self because of the process of universalisation taking place during the aesthetic contemplation of characters depicted in the work of art.

Abhinavagupta maintains that this rasa (literally, taste or essence). Rasa, the final outcome is the summum bonum of all literature.

 

Bibliography

Natyasastra of Bharatamuni : Text, Commentary of Abhinava Bharati by Abhinavaguptacarya and English Translation/edited by Pushpendra Kumar. Translated by M.M. Ghosh. Delhi, New Bharatiya Book Corporation, 2006, 3 Vols., 1614 p